{"id":893,"date":"2011-08-12T19:00:58","date_gmt":"2011-08-13T02:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/?p=893"},"modified":"2014-10-21T12:34:14","modified_gmt":"2014-10-21T19:34:14","slug":"nprs-100-best-sff-list","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/?p=893","title":{"rendered":"NPR&#8217;s 100 Best Science Fiction &#038; Fantasy Book List"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/nprsmall.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/nprsmall.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"nprsmall\" width=\"352\" height=\"103\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-899\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/nprsmall.jpg 352w, https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/nprsmall-300x87.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 352px) 100vw, 352px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<br \/>\nAfter 5,000 online nominations, 60,000 votes and parsing by some of the genre&#8217;s brightest and most knowledgeable critics and scholars, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/monkeysee\/2011\/08\/11\/139346998\/nprs-top-100-science-fiction-and-fantasy-novels-parsing-the-results\">NPR<\/a> has published its list of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2011\/08\/11\/139085843\/your-picks-top-100-science-fiction-fantasy-books\">100 most vote-gettingest SFF books<\/a> that a bunch of web-surfers can remember. I have been awaiting this list since I first heard about it a few weeks ago.  NPR has a lot of credibility, as far as I am concerned, as do <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnclute.co.uk\/\">John Clute<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farahsf.com\/\">Farah Mendlesohn<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/sites.roosevelt.edu\/gwolfe\/\">Gary K. Wolfe<\/a>, the afore-mentioned big brains of the SFF\/criticism world. But I just cannot help but be disappointed when I see that some fool(s) decided that the Xanth series deserves a place on this list. Or that <em>American Gods<\/em> is top-10, while <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php\/reviews\/info\/105\">Watchmen<\/a><\/em> is not. And seriously; Jasper-fucking-Fforde?  Why not add Robert Asprin as well?  <\/p>\n<p>I suppose I should be happy, because overall the list is pretty strong. But I had such high hopes here. I am a sucker for best-of lists, but I have yet to see a really great one for SFF books. Most other online vote lists are a bloody mess. (<a href=\"http:\/\/thisrecording.com\/today\/2010\/1\/18\/in-which-we-count-down-the-100-greatest-science-fiction-or-f.html\">Uh-huh<\/a>.  <a href=\"http:\/\/gurge.com\/amd\/top100\/\">Uh-huh<\/a>.  <a href=\"http:\/\/simeyc.hubpages.com\/hub\/The-Best-Fantasy-and-Science-Fiction-Books-of-all-time\">Uh-huh<\/a>).  (Although, <a href=\"http:\/\/home.austarnet.com.au\/petersykes\/topscifi\/index.html\">some ain&#8217;t bad<\/a>.  Nope.  Not at all).  Individual lists, while sometimes great, almost always include a few books like The Birth of the People&#8217;s Republic of Antarctica (thanks, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldswithoutend.com\/lists_pringle_sf.asp\">Mr. Pringle<\/a>), or some other bullshit personal favorite that is wholly incapable of standing with the books that really belong on lists of this type. <\/p>\n<p>Well, as much of a whiner as I am about this, I am eagerly awaiting the publish date (set sometime next year) of <a href=\"http:\/\/nonstop-press.com\/?page_id=41\">The 101 Best Science Fiction Novels, 1985-2010<\/a>, by Damien Broderick and Paul di Filippo; basically a second volume to Pringle&#8217;s work, linked above. With a year or so to go, I&#8217;ve got plenty of time to heighten my hopes again. <\/p>\n<p>Oh yeah.  And instead of &#8220;Be British,&#8221; it might be &#8220;Be British or American,&#8221; as the <em>other half<\/em> of the authors in the top ten are from . . . guess where?  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After 5,000 online nominations, 60,000 votes and parsing by some of the genre&#8217;s brightest and most knowledgeable critics and scholars, NPR has published its list of the 100 most vote-gettingest SFF books that a bunch of web-surfers can remember. I have been awaiting this list since I first heard about it a few weeks ago. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=893"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":916,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893\/revisions\/916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.omphalosbookreviews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}